Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40001678›Full record

ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025

23Na-MRI for Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment Monitoring: A Scoping Review.

Taylor Smith, Minh Chau, Jordan Sims, Elio Arruzza

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Taylor SmithAllied Health & Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0911-1965
Minh ChauSchool of Dentistry and Medical Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2670, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2306-3437
Jordan SimsJones Radiology, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.
Elio ArruzzaAllied Health & Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7328-6677

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: Variations in intracellular and extracellular sodium levels have been hypothesized to serve as biomarkers for tumour characterization and therapeutic response. While previous research has explored the feasibility of 23Na-MRI, a comprehensive review of its clinical utility in breast cancer is lacking. This scoping review aims to synthesize existing literature on the potential role of 23Na-MRI in breast cancer diagnosis and treatment monitoring. (2) Methods: This review included English-language studies reporting on quantitative applications of 23Na-MRI in breast cancer. Systematic searches were conducted across PubMed, Emcare, Embase, Scopus, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, and Medline. (3) Results: Seven primary studies met the inclusion criteria, highlighting the ability of 23Na-MRI to differentiate between malignant and benign breast lesions based on elevated total sodium concentration (TSC) in tumour tissues. 23Na-MRI also showed potential in early prediction of treatment response, with significant reductions in TSC observed in responders. However, the studies varied widely in their protocols, use of phantoms, field strengths, and contrast agent application, limiting inter-study comparability. (4) Conclusion: 23Na-MRI holds promise as a complementary imaging modality for breast cancer diagnosis and treatment monitoring. However, standardization of imaging protocols and technical optimization are essential before it can be translated into clinical practice.

Indexed as

23Na-MRIbreast cancerdiagnosismagnetic resonance imagingsodiumtotal sodium concentrationtreatment monitoring

Identifiers

PMID40001678
PMCPMC11851933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.