Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40001677›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Geometric Self-Supervised Learning: A Novel AI Approach Towards Quantitative and Explainable Diabetic Retinopathy Detection.

Lucas Pu, Oliver Beale, Xin Meng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lucas PuDepartment of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA.
Oliver BealeDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Xin MengDepartment of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA.

Funding

Automation of the radiographic surgical indicators for pediatric orbital abscessR01EY033973 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Roxana Fu, Jiantao Pu · 2024 to 2026
$1.4M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY033973NIH HHS R01EY033973
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiabetic retinopathy (DR) is the leading cause of blindness among working-age adults. Early detection is crucial to reducing DR-related vision loss risk but is fraught with challenges. Manual detection is labor-intensive and often misses tiny DR lesions, necessitating automated detection.

objectiveWe aimed to develop and validate an annotation-free deep learning strategy for the automatic detection of exudates and bleeding spots on color fundus photography (CFP) images and ultrawide field (UWF) retinal images. MATERIALS AND

methodsThree cohorts were created: two CFP cohorts (Kaggle-CFP and E-Ophtha) and one UWF cohort. Kaggle-CFP was used for algorithm development, while E-Ophtha, with manually annotated DR-related lesions, served as the independent test set. For additional independent testing, 50 DR-positive cases from both the Kaggle-CFP and UWF cohorts were manually outlined for bleeding and exudate spots. The remaining cases were used for algorithm training. A multiscale contrast-based shape descriptor transformed DR-verified retinal images into contrast fields. High-contrast regions were identified, and local image patches from abnormal and normal areas were extracted to train a U-Net model. Model performance was evaluated using sensitivity and false positive rates based on manual annotations in the independent test sets.

resultsOur trained model on the independent CFP cohort achieved high sensitivities for detecting and segmenting DR lesions: microaneurysms (91.5%, 9.04 false positives per image), hemorrhages (92.6%, 2.26 false positives per image), hard exudates (92.3%, 7.72 false positives per image), and soft exudates (90.7%, 0.18 false positives per image). For UWF images, the model's performance varied by lesion size. Bleeding detection sensitivity increased with lesion size, from 41.9% (6.48 false positives per image) for the smallest spots to 93.4% (5.80 false positives per image) for the largest. Exudate detection showed high sensitivity across all sizes, ranging from 86.9% (24.94 false positives per image) to 96.2% (6.40 false positives per image), though false positive rates were higher for smaller lesions.

conclusionsOur experiments demonstrate the feasibility of training a deep learning neural network for detecting and segmenting DR-related lesions without relying on their manual annotations.

Indexed as

diabetic retinopathyimage segmentationlesion-level detectionself-supervised learningshape descriptor

Identifiers

PMID40001677
PMCPMC11852169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.