ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
MWG-UNet++: Hybrid Transformer U-Net Model for Brain Tumor Segmentation in MRI Scans.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multimodal Deep Learning and Knowledge-Enhanced Intelligent Decision Support System for Pipeline Embolization Device Size Selection in Intracranial Aneurysm Treatment.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2026Article
- Review
- Magnetic resonance imaging diagnosis of knee injuries after skiing in adolescents under deep learning.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Deep learning based 3D brain metastasis synthesis with configurable parameters for 3D data augmentation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- FALS-YOLO: An Efficient and Lightweight Method for Automatic Brain Tumor Detection and Segmentation.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- ResSAXU-Net for multimodal brain tumor segmentation from brain MRI.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Dual-Stream Contrastive Latent Learning Generative Adversarial Network for Brain Image Synthesis and Tumor Classification.Journal of imaging · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The accurate segmentation of brain tumors from medical images is critical for diagnosis and treatment planning. However, traditional segmentation methods struggle with complex tumor shapes and inconsistent image quality which leads to suboptimal results. To address this challenge, we propose multiple tasking Wasserstein Generative Adversarial Network U-shape Network++ (MWG-UNet++) to brain tumor segmentation by integrating a U-Net architecture enhanced with transformer layers which combined with Wasserstein Generative Adversarial Networks (WGAN) for data augmentation. The proposed model called Residual Attention U-shaped Network (RAUNet) for brain tumor segmentation leverages the robust feature extraction capabilities of U-Net and the global context awareness provided by transformers to improve segmentation accuracy. Incorporating WGAN for data augmentation addresses the challenge of limited medical imaging datasets to generate high-quality synthetic images that enhance model training and generalization. Our comprehensive evaluation demonstrates that this hybrid model significantly improves segmentation performance. The RAUNet outperforms compared approaches by capturing long-range dependencies and considering spatial variations. The use of WGANs augments the dataset for resulting in robust training and improved resilience to overfitting. The average evaluation metric for brain tumor segmentation is 0.8965 which outperformed the compared methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.