ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Scoping Review of Machine Learning and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Spine Surgery.
Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predictive Analysis of Social Determinants of Health in Posterior Cervical Spine Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Review
- Artificial intelligence in spine care: A scoping review of treatment applications.North American Spine Society journal · 2026Review
- Recent Advances in AI and GenAI for Health Informatics.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Machine learning is an evolving branch of artificial intelligence that is being applied in neurosurgical research. In spine surgery, machine learning has been used for radiographic characterization of cranial and spinal pathology and in predicting postoperative outcomes such as complications, functional recovery, and pain relief. A relevant application is the investigation of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after spine surgery. Although a multitude of PROMs have been described and validated, there is currently no consensus regarding which questionnaires should be utilized. Additionally, studies have reported varying degrees of accuracy in predicting patient outcomes based on questionnaire responses. PROMs currently lack standardization, which renders them difficult to compare across studies. The purpose of this manuscript is to identify applications of machine learning to predict PROMs after spine surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.