Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40001576›Full record

ReviewBiomolecules2025

NK Cell-Microbiota Interaction Biomarker Strategy: Advancing Prostate Cancer Management.

Sara Fanijavadi, Torben Frøstrup Hansen, Ahmed Hussein Zedan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomolecules, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sara FanijavadiCancer Polyclinic, Levanger Hospital, 7601 Levanger, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-9977-5479
Torben Frøstrup HansenDepartment of Oncology, Vejle Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, 7100 Vejle, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-7476-671X
Ahmed Hussein ZedanDepartment of Oncology, Vejle Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, 7100 Vejle, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-8895-6394

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The role of natural killer (NK) cells in the management of prostate cancer (PCa) remains incompletely understood. Some have proposed that measuring NK cells in blood samples could serve as a reliable, minimally invasive tool for screening, assessing treatment effects, and predicting survival outcomes in PCa patients. However, the significance of different NK cell phenotypes remains unclear. Given the interplay between NK cells and the microbiome, we hypothesize that a combined signature of NK cell phenotypes derived from blood, along with microbiome profiles from oral, urine, and stool samples, could serve as a surrogate marker for NK cell activity in tumor and its microenvironment. Such an approach provides a practical alternative to invasive tumor biopsies by enabling the indirect assessment of NK cell function in tumors. Additionally, profiling NK cell phenotypes and their interactions with the microbiota has the potential to enhance prognostic accuracy and guide the development of personalized therapeutic strategies. Prospective studies are needed to validate the utility of NK cell and microbiome assays in personalized PCa management, with a focus on minimally invasive procedures and predictive signatures for treatment outcomes.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorKiller Cells, NaturalMicrobiotaProstatic NeoplasmsHumansMaleTumor MicroenvironmentBiomarkers, TumorbiomarkermicrobiotaNK cellsprostate cancer

Identifiers

PMID40001576
PMCPMC11852595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.