ReviewAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Bridging the Gap: A Systematic Review with Expert Opinion on the Use of Dalbavancin for In-Label and Off-Label Indications in Pediatric Patients.
Review in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Stewardship Challenges, PK/PD Evidence, and Prescribing Appropriateness for Recently Approved Antibiotics in Pediatric Practice.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- TDM-Guided Dalbavancin Treatment for ComplexAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThe aim of this work was to perform a systematic review assessing the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) properties of dalbavancin and the clinical use for in-label and off-label indications in pediatric patients.
methodsTwo authors independently searched the PubMed-MEDLINE and Scopus databases and clinicaltrials.gov up to 20 November 2024, to retrieve randomized controlled trials (RCTs), observational studies, PK studies, and case series/reports assessing dalbavancin PK/PD properties or the clinical use for both in-label and off-label indications in pediatric patients. Data were independently extracted by the two authors, and the quality of the included studies was independently assessed by means of specific tools according to study design. Clinical success was selected as the primary outcome. Descriptive statistics were used for summarizing the retrieved data. Subgroup analysis according to PK/PD data, as well as in-label and off-label indications, was performed.
resultsAfter screening 206 articles, nine studies were included in the systematic review (one RCT, three PK studies, and five case series/reports;
conclusionsOur systematic review summarized evidence concerning the PK/PD properties of dalbavancin and its use for in-label or off-label indications in pediatric patients. The available findings suggest that dalbavancin may be a valuable alternative for the management of ABSSSIs and/or off-label indications in pediatric patients according to efficacy and safety data, allowing for a potential minimized duration of hospital stay.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.