ArticleArchives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique2025
Analysis of factors influencing attrition among clinical traditional Chinese medical major graduates: based on a discrete choice experiment.
Article in Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTraditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) is essential for promoting health worldwide. Despite governmental support, TCM faces critical challenges, including workforce shortages and high attrition rates, with many clinical TCM graduates pursuing non-clinical careers. This study aims to explore the employment preferences of these graduates and to propose strategies for retaining TCM professionals, optimizing the input-output ratio of TCM education, and supporting the sustainable development of the TCM industry.
methodsA stratified sampling method was used to select clinical TCM major graduates from 16 universities of Chinese medicine. A Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE) was conducted to investigate the factors influencing the attrition of clinical TCM professionals, including monthly income, work location, housing security, workload, work environment, and promotion opportunities. A mixed logit model was applied to analyze the DCE data.
resultsA total of 273 clinical TCM major graduates were included in the primary DCE analysis. The monthly income was more important than other attributes (RAI = 48.03%). Among non-economic factors, participants expressed the strongest willingness to decrease workload, being willing to forgo 3,370.312 yuan (approximately $500.3) in monthly income to reduce heavy workloads to moderate levels. Other significant factors included work environment (RAI = 13.64%), housing security (RAI = 9.47%), and promotion opportunities (RAI = 5.33%), with work location being the least important (RAI = 3.3%). Subgroup analysis showed that rural graduates were more willing than urban graduates to forgo monthly income for promotion opportunities. Graduates from the central region of China valued work environment and housing security more than those from the eastern and western regions. Postgraduates were more likely than undergraduates to give up monthly income for housing security.
conclusionIn addition to economic factors, non-economic factors are also critical considerations for clinical TCM major graduates in their employment decisions. A combination of measures, including offering lower workloads, better work environments, housing security, and promotion opportunities, should be adopted to stabilize the employment environment for clinical TCM graduates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.