ArticleVirology journal2025
Development of attenuated Orf virus as a safe oncolytic viral vector for nasopharyngeal carcinoma treatment.
Article in Virology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Viral warriors: Unlocking the immune system's potential with oncolytic viruses in cancer immunotherapy.Molecular therapy. Oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOrf virus (ORFV) is gaining attention as a promising viral vector for cancer therapy because of its unique properties. Recent studies have shown that ORFV could be effective against various cancers, particularly nasopharyngeal carcinoma. This research explores the ability of wild-type ORFV and recombinant ORFVs, which lack specific virulence factors, to kill NPC cells and modulate the immune response.
methodsTwo NPC cell lines, HK1 (from Hong Kong) and TW02 (from Taiwan), were infected with wild-type ORFV and two recombinant ORFVs lacking either vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) or chemokine binding protein (CBP) virulence factors. The oncolytic effects were evaluated by assessing cell death pathways, particularly pyroptosis, which was monitored through the cleavage of gasdermin E (GSDME). The activation of survival pathways, such as focal adhesion kinase (FAK) and AKT, was also analyzed. In addition, the influence of ORFV infection on natural killer (NK) cell recruitment and cytotoxicity was investigated. In vivo experiments were conducted in a xenograft mouse model in which HK1 tumors were used to evaluate the antitumor activity of wild-type ORFV and two deletion-mutant ORFVs.
resultsWild-type ORFV effectively killed NPC cells, especially HK1 cells. The recombinant ORFVs, despite being attenuated by the loss of VEGF or CBP, retained the ability to infect and cause NPC cell death, with the CBP-deleted virus showing notable effectiveness in HK1 cells. Early ORFV infection led to pyroptosis via GSDME cleavage, causing cell detachment and a reduction in FAK and AKT activation. ORFV also enhanced NK cell recruitment and boosted NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity in infected NPC cells. In the HK1 xenograft model, CBP-deleted ORFV significantly inhibited tumor growth.
conclusionORFV, particularly the wild-type and CBP-deleted variants, has significant potential as an oncolytic viral vector for NPC therapy. It induces cell death via pyroptosis and enhances immune-mediated tumor cell destruction through NK cells. The attenuated CBP-deleted ORFV offers a safer and effective option for cancer treatment, making it a promising candidate for future therapeutic applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.