ArticleDiabetology & metabolic syndrome2025
Metabolic syndrome including both elevated blood pressure and elevated fasting plasma glucose is associated with higher mortality risk: a prospective study.
Article in Diabetology & metabolic syndrome, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sex-specific associations between grip strength and metabolic syndrome in Korean adults: a nationally representative cross-sectional study.Preventive medicine reports · 2026Article
- Evaluation of the effect of baseline predictors on the incidence of metabolic syndrome in middle-aged and elderly individuals: a population-based cohort study in Southwest Iran.Diabetology & metabolic syndrome · 2026Article
- Review
- Precision Medicine in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: The Emerging Role of Metabolic Dysfunction.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Ultrasound and MRI abdominal fat distribution and its associations with metabolic conditions in adults with abdominal obesity.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2026Article
- Association of Composite Metabolic Indices and Oxidative Stress Biomarkers with Coronary Atherosclerosis Detected by CT Angiography in Premenopausal Women with Metabolic Syndrome.Vascular health and risk management · 2026Article
- Nutrition Patterns, Metabolic and Psychological State Among High-Weight Young Adults: A Network Approach.Nutrients · 2026Article
- Article
- Marine Bioactive Peptides-Structure, Function, and Application 2.0.Marine drugs · 2025Article
- Identifying Four Developmental Trajectories of Metabolic Syndrome and Their Influencing Factors: A Longitudinal Cohort Study of Railway Employees' Physical Examinations.International journal of endocrinology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMetabolic syndrome (MetS) encompasses a collection of metabolic abnormalities. This study aims to determine which combination of MetS components has the highest mortality risk, and to investigate the causal relationships between MetS components and longevity.
methodsProspective analyses were conducted on 340,196 participants from the MJ cohort at baseline, and 121,936 participants had follow-up MetS information. We defined MetS according to the NCEP ATP III criteria. The study's outcomes included mortality from cardiovascular disease (CVD), cancer, and all causes combined. We employed Cox proportional hazard models to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals. Multivariable Mendelian randomization (MVMR) was employed to infer causality using the genetic data of MetS components and longevity.
resultsElevated blood pressure (BP) was the initial split for all-cause mortality, cancer mortality, and CVD mortality. Participants with MetS, especially those with elevated BP and elevated fasting plasma glucose (FPG), had higher mortality risks than those with other types of MetS. In the MJ cohort, participants with elevated BP and FPG (BG-type MetS) had a 44% (HR = 1.44, 95% CI = 1.37-1.51), 73% (HR = 1.73, 95% CI = 1.62-1.84), and 34% (HR = 1.34, 95% CI = 1.27-1.42) increased risk of all-cause mortality, cancer mortality, and CVD mortality, respectively, compared with non-BG-type MetS (12%, 24%, 5%). The highest mortality rate and mortality risk were observed in participants with BG-type MetS at baseline and follow-up (mortality rate/1000 person years = 9.73, 95% CI = 8.81-10.74; HR = 1.52, 95% CI = 1.35-1.72). SBP and FPG increases that were genetically proxied to a 1-standard deviation higher level decreased the probabilities of living to the 90th percentile age by 41% (OR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.40-0.86) and 32% (OR = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.48-0.98) in MVMR, respectively.
conclusionsIndividuals with BG-type MetS are at a higher risk of death than those with other types of MetS. Therefore, these individuals should be targeted to improve MetS outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.