ArticleBMC pharmacology & toxicology2025
Haemorrhage-related adverse events profles of lenvatinib and pembrolizumab alone or in combination: a real-world pharmacovigilance study based on FAERS database.
Article in BMC pharmacology & toxicology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative safety analysis of enfortumab vedotin and pembrolizumab: monotherapy vs. combination therapy insights from FDA adverse event reporting system data.World journal of urology · 2026Article
- Sequential anlotinib and camrelizumab combination therapy achieves exceptional survival in multi-driver mutated, TMB-low/PD-L1-low/MSS pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma: case report and literature review.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveLimited understanding exists regarding the haemorrhagic risk resulting from potential interactions between lenvatinib and pembrolizumab. We investigated haemorrhagic adverse events (ADEs) associated with co-administration of lenvatinib and pembrolizumab using data from the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) in an effort to provide recommendations for their safe and sensible use.
methodsThe FAERS database's bleeding events linked to lenvatinib and pembrolizumab were carefully examined. Haemorrhagic signals mining was performed by the reported odds ratios (RORs) and information component (IC), corroborated by additive and multiplicative models.
resultsA total of 38,416,055 adverse event cases were analyzed, with 1188 bleeding events records in the lenvatinib alone, 952 bleeding events records in the pembrolizumab alone and 420 bleeding events reports in the combination therapy, respectively. We observed a significantly higher risk of haemorrhage with the combination of lenvatinib and pembrolizumab compare with pembrolizumab alone. In addition, in the baseline model analysis of suspected bleeding adverse reactions, the additive model detected an increased incidence of small intestinal haemorrhage caused by combination therapy, and found no risk signals of tumour haemorrhage and tracheal haemorrhage; the results of multiplicative model are all negative.
conclusionThe analysis of FAERS data reveals different levels of haemorrhagic risk when lenvatinib and pembrolizumab are administered concurrently, highlighting the significance of being cautious when using them in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.