Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40001193›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity2025

BMI or not to BMI? debating the value of body mass index as a measure of health in adults.

Carmen Byker Shanks, Meg Bruening, Amy L Yaroch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Weight management for chronic low back pain.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2026
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Carmen Byker ShanksCenter for Nutriton & Health Impact, 14301 FNB Parkway, Suite 100, Omaha, NE, 68154, USA. cbshanks@centerfornutrition.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9030-9938
Meg BrueningDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, College of Health and Human Development, Penn State University, University Park, PA, USA.
Amy L YarochCenter for Nutriton & Health Impact, 14301 FNB Parkway, Suite 100, Omaha, NE, 68154, USA.

Funding

National Institute of Food and Agriculture 2019-70030-30415/project accession no. 1020863National Institute of Food and Agriculture 2023-70414-40461/project accession no. 1031111
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Body mass index (BMI) is used across public health to calculate height to weight ratio and translate into weight status. Whether BMI is appropriate as an individual- or population-level health measure for adults is debated. BMI is a cost-effective and feasible metric to establish health risk. Yet, BMI's historical underpinnings, weight categories, usefulness as clinical diagnostic measure, and application across population subgroups has called the measurement tool into question. At the annual ISBNPA meeting in June 2023, the co-authors engaged in a debate session on the topic. This paper presents the complexity of arguments for or against BMI as a measurement tool and proposes its evolution to support whole-person health.

Indexed as

Body Mass IndexHealth StatusAdultBody WeightHumansObesityBody mass indexNutritionPhysical ActivityPublic health interventionWeight bias

Identifiers

PMID40001193
PMCPMC11863867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.