Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40001158›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2025

An In-depth analysis of nurses' knowledge, practice, and attitude towards neurological examination and the challenges: "bridging the gap".

Noha Mohammed Ibrahim, Shereen Ahmed A Qalawa, Nermen Abdelftah Mohamed, Ateya Megahed Ibrahim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Noha Mohammed IbrahimDepartment of Nursing, College of Applied Medical Sciences, University of Bisha, Bisha, Saudi Arabia.
Shereen Ahmed A QalawaDepartment of Medical and Surgical, College of Nursing, Qassim University, Buraidah, 51452, Saudi Arabia.
Nermen Abdelftah MohamedNursing College, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia.
Ateya Megahed IbrahimNursing College, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia. ateyamegahed@yahoo.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeurological illnesses require thorough examinations and evidence-based care to minimize consequences and enhance life quality.

aimTo analyze nurses' knowledge, practices, and attitudes toward neurological examinations and identify associated challenges.

methodsA descriptive cross-sectional design was employed. A total of 205 nurses from Kafr El Sheikh General Hospital were included in the study. Data was collected using an electronic questionnaire composed of two tools. The first tool assessed nurses' knowledge, practice, and attitudes toward neurological examinations, while the second tool explored challenges faced during these assessments. The questionnaire was distributed online, and the responses were analyzed for various demographic and professional factors.

resultsNurses exhibited moderate knowledge (mean score: 22.22, SD: 5.22), positive attitudes (mean score: 8.78, SD: 2.81), and moderate practices (mean score: 1.96, SD: 1.36) regarding neurological assessments. Significant correlations were observed between knowledge and attitudes (r = 0.284, p < 0.001), knowledge and practice (r = 0.143, p = 0.041), and attitudes and practice (r = 0.186, p = 0.008). Major challenges included a dependence on technology with a mean score of 28.47 and, secondly, time constraints, which had a mean score of 15.29. For the demographic data that reached statistical significance, the factors included younger nurses, where 53.7% fell between the range of 20-30 years of education, and where 31.7% had their degree as a Nursing Technician. Therefore, younger and better-educated nurses were performing better. Targeted education thus made a difference, as 55.1% of the nurses who had training in neurological assessments reported improved knowledge and practice.

conclusionThese findings highlight the need for targeted interventions to address the challenges nurses face, suggesting that providing additional training, fostering a supportive ward culture, and empowering nurses in their roles could enhance their confidence and competence in conducting neurological assessments, ultimately improving patient care. RECOMMENDATIONS: develop comprehensive training programs that strengthen assessment skills and reduce reliance on technology, introduce time management strategies to cope with constraints and interruptions, foster a supportive ward culture, establish mentorship programs, involve nurses in patient care decisions, provide specialty-specific support, encourage continuous professional development, and implement standardized assessment protocols. CLINICAL TRIALS: No clinical trials.

Indexed as

AttitudesClinical challengesHealthcare ImprovementNeurological assessmentsNurses’ knowledgePractices

Identifiers

PMID40001158
PMCPMC11863585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.