Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40001152›Full record

ReviewBMC biology2025

Mechanical stimulation in plants: molecular insights, morphological adaptations, and agricultural applications in monocots.

Annalene Hansen, Agnieszka Gladala-Kostarz, Rebecca Hindhaugh, John H Doonan, Maurice Bosch

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Annalene Hansen *Institute of Biological Environmental and Rural Sciences (IBERS), Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth, Gogerddan, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3096-476X
Agnieszka Gladala-Kostarz *Department of Biosciences, Durham University, Durham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1640-4029
Rebecca Hindhaugh *, Newbury, UK.
John H DoonanInstitute of Biological Environmental and Rural Sciences (IBERS), Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth, Gogerddan, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6027-1919
Maurice BoschInstitute of Biological Environmental and Rural Sciences (IBERS), Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth, Gogerddan, UK. mub@aber.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1990-589X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mechanical stimulation, including wind exposure, is a common environmental factor for plants and can significantly impact plant phenotype, development, and growth. Most responses to external mechanical stimulation are defined by the term thigmomorphogenesis. While these morphogenetic changes in growth and development may not be immediately apparent, their end-results can be substantial. Although mostly studied in dicotyledonous plants, recently monocot grasses, particularly cereal crops, have received more attention. This review summarizes current knowledge on mechanical stimulation in plants, particularly focusing on the molecular, physiological, and phenological responses in cereals, and explores practical applications to sustainably improve the resilience of agricultural crops.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalCrops, AgriculturalPoaceaeStress, MechanicalAgricultureEdible GrainCell wall remodellingCereal crop mechanobiologyCrop resilience to mechanical stressGrassesLodging resistanceThigmomorphogenesis

Identifiers

PMID40001152
PMCPMC11863685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.