ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2025
Factors influencing pain intensity in knee osteoarthritis: a cross-sectional biopsychosocial perspective.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Smartphone-Based Physical Performance and Multidimensional Determinants of Self-Reported Knee Pain in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: Cross-Sectional Machine Learning and Network Analysis Study.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2026Article
- Phenomenological exploration of perceptions, experiences, facilitators, and inhibitors in patients with knee osteoarthritis during physiotherapy rehabilitation in a low- and middle-income country.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
- Psychological stress and gut microbiota regulation of osteoarthritis progression: mechanisms and therapeutic strategies.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- Knee osteoarthritis rehabilitation: an integrated framework of exercise, nutrition, biomechanics, and physical therapist guidance-a narrative review.European journal of medical research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPain is pivotal in managing knee osteoarthritis (KOA), necessitating tailored rehabilitative strategies. The biopsychosocial framework suggests that a multifaceted approach is crucial for understanding and managing pain in KOA patients. This study explored the factors that influence pain intensity through biological and psychosocial determinants from a biopsychological perspective in KOA patients.
methodsThis cross-sectional study included 150 KOA patients with Kellgren-Lawrence (K/L) grades 2-4. Patients were classified into three groups based on their Visual Analogue Scale scores: mild (n = 79), moderate (n = 40), and severe pain intensity (n = 31). The biological determinants included the body mass index, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) for knee function, the 30-second sit-to-stand (30STS) test for functional strength, and the Timed-Up and Go (TUG) test for mobility. Psychological determinants comprised the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21) for emotional well-being, the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK) for kinesiophobia, and the Activities-Specific Balance Confidence (ABC) scale for balance confidence. Social determinants included educational attainment and the Short Form-36 (SF-36) for health-related quality of life.
resultsSignificant differences in biopsychosocial determinants were identified among the various pain intensity groups. Biological factors, including WOMAC scores, TUG, and 30STS tests; psychological factors, such as depression and anxiety (DASS-21) and kinesiophobia (TSK); and social factors, including mean years of education and all SF-36 subscales, were significantly worse in the severe pain group (p < 0.05). However, balance confidence did not differ between groups (p = 0.060). Patients in the severe pain group exhibited poorer outcomes across biological, psychological, and social domains, whereas the moderate pain group displayed worse biological and social outcomes when compared to the mild pain group (p < 0.05).
conclusionThis study emphasizes the significance of a biopsychosocial framework in managing pain in KOA patients. Worsened biological factors like knee function, mobility, and functional strength, alongside psychological issues such as depression and anxiety, influence pain intensity. Social determinants, including lower educational attainment and quality of life, highlight the need for patient-centered care. Future research should include diverse populations and longitudinal data to improve interventions and guide global health policies for integrating the biopsychosocial perspective for KOA management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.