ArticleBMC medical education2025
Ethnic diversity and inclusiveness among medical residents in the Netherlands: results from a single-centered survey study.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of studyDespite the recognized importance of an ethnically diverse healthcare workforce, the current population of medical specialists does not adequately reflect our society. To further unravel how and at which stages of the career path such diversity loss occurs, we studied ethnic diversity and perceptions of inclusiveness among medical residents. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study among all residents of Erasmus Medical Center in the highly multicultural city of Rotterdam, the Netherlands. An online survey was distributed, in which we inquired about (i) ethnic diversity and (ii) perceptions of inclusivity. The latter outcome includes sense of belonging to the team of supervisors, measured by perceived level of resemblance between residents and their supervisor(s), while focusing on ethnic, cultural, and socioeconomic levels. Residents from different specialties were divided into four groups, according to their medical specialty, i.e., surgical specialties, internal medicine specialties, overall diagnostic/supportive specialties, and family medicine & intellectual disability medicine. Descriptive statistics were applied.
resultsFrom the total of 986 invited residents, 493 (50.0%) participated (median age 32 years [IQR 30-34]), consisting of 346 (70.2%) females. Results showed that the majority, 335 (68.2%) were of Dutch origin, 90 (18.3%) were children of migrants, and 66 (13.4%) were migrants. We observed notable differences across medical specialties, with the highest degree of ethnic diversity in surgical specialties. Except for residents from supportive specialties, residents from other specialties who are (children of) migrants reported significantly more often that they experienced differences on ethnic and/or cultural levels with their supervisors than residents of Dutch origin.
conclusionWhile (children of) migrants were underrepresented in this cohort, especially given the demographic distribution of the region of Rotterdam, a comparison of our results with previously published census data on medical students cohorts indicates no substantial loss of ethnic diversity in the transition from medical student to residency. Yet, these groups scored lower on questions related to sense of belonging. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.