ArticleLipids in health and disease2025
Establishing and internally validating a predictive model for coronary heart disease incorporating triglyceride-glucose index, monocyte-to-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio and conventional risk factors in patients experiencing chest pain and referred for invasive coronary angiography.
Article in Lipids in health and disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Utility of artificial intelligence in predicting clinical outcomes of angiographic procedures: a comprehensive scoping review.Journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCoronary heart disease (CHD) represents a severe form of ischemic cardiac condition that necessitates timely and accurate diagnosis. Although coronary angiography (CAG) remains widely used to detect CHD, healthcare facilities, medical expenses, and equipment technology often limit its availability. Therefore, it is imperative to identify a non-invasive diagnostic approach with high accuracy for CHD.
methodsThis cross-sectional research included patients with chest pain (≥ 18 years) hospitalized at Chengde Central Hospital between September 2020 and March 2024. Among the participants, 70% were split into the training, and 30% were randomly entered into the validation sets. In the training dataset, univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were rigorously employed to ascertain predictors of CHD. A model was formulated by incorporating these predictors in a nomogram, which was evaluated for accuracy using calibration curves. The model's discrimination was quantified by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, denoted as the area under the curve (AUC), and its clinical application value was determined through decision curve analysis (DCA). Finally, we compare our model against the pretest probability (PTP) calculated by the Update Diamond-Forrester Model (UDFM) as recommended by the ECS guidelines to comprehensively assess its performance.
resultsThis study included 1501 patients who presented with chest pain, with a mean age of 60.45 years, 865 males (57.60%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed TyG index, MHR, male, age, diabetes, systolic blood pressure (SBP), regional wall motion abnormality (RWMA), ST-T changes, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) as independent predictors of CHD. A novel nomogram incorporating these independent risk factors exhibited high accuracy and perfect consistency, with a training set AUC calculated to be 0.733 (95% CI: 0.698-0.768), and the validation set maintained a strong performance at 0.721 (95% CI: 0.663-0.779). The calibration curves and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test confirmed the well-fitting model (P = 0.576 and P = 0.694). ROC curve analysis and DCA demonstrated that the model has robust forecasting capability.
conclusionThe nomogram model in this study exhibited good discriminative ability, calibration, and a favorable net benefit. Its predictive performance exceeds that of the traditional PTP tool and may serve as a non-invasive and promising approach to aid clinicians in the early identification of CHD risk in patients presenting with chest pain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.