ArticleThe international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity2025
Designing stepped wedge trials to evaluate physical activity interventions in schools: methodological considerations.
Article in The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Primary school physical activity culture in the UK: findings from a four-month rapid ethnography in three schools.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn a stepped wedge design, schools are randomised to a sequence of measurements, with each sequence transitioning to intervention status at a different time. There are several advantages to such designs, including increased statistical power, logistical benefits and the ability to explore change over time. However, stepped wedge designs have not previously been used to evaluate school-based physical activity interventions in children. This paper aimed to explore the feasibility of this design, by identifying school constraints, balancing these with statistical considerations and exploring the power of this chosen design under different scenarios.
methodsWe conducted three interlinked studies, with the results from one informing the next. Study 1 was a qualitative study to identify school constraints that inform the choice of stepped wedge configuration. Study 2 used simulation to choose a configuration that balanced these school constraints and statistical properties. Study 3 explored the statistical power for the chosen design for different school and pupil sample sizes, using an open cohort design (a mixture of new and repeated pupils).
resultsSchool staff considered the proposed data collection feasible, and supported a maximum of 3-4 measurements per year and an implementation period of one school term. Study 2 therefore considered incomplete stepped wedge designs with five steps. Statistically, the best designs had a mix of control and intervention measurements in terms 2-4 and a spread of measurements across the whole study duration. Power depended on a combination of the overall recruitment rate and the retention rate. For 20 schools with an eligible class size of 30 pupils, we would be able to detect a 6 min difference in average weekday moderate-to-vigorous physical activity with 80% power, provided there were > 50% of pupils measured per school at each time. A similarly powered cluster randomised controlled trial would require 42 schools.
conclusionStepped wedge trials are a viable design for evaluating school-based physical activity interventions. Incomplete designs, where not all schools are measured at each point, offer the flexibility to work around practical constraints.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.