Trial reportBMC medical education2025
Training clinicians to facilitate diabetes group visits.
Trial report in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04835493 (Evaluating Telementoring to Initiate a Multidimensional Diabetes Program for Latino), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Evaluating Telementoring to Initiate a Multidimensional Diabetes Program for Latino(a)s in Community Clinics: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Trials to Practice: Implementing a Clinical Intervention in Community Settings.Journal of primary care & community healthTrial
- Age-related variations in HbA1c improvements: insights from a telehealth-supported community-based intervention.Innovation in aging · 2025Article
- Implementing an Integrative Medicine Group Visit Facilitator Training Program to Improve Chronic Pain Management in the Safety-Net.Global advances in integrative medicine and healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionManaging diabetes in community clinics often presents substantial challenges. Diabetes group visits, shared medical appointments involving a clinician, offer a potential solution to these challenges. However, there is a need for training clinicians to effectively lead and facilitate these group visits.
aimThe aim of this study is to develop and assess a training program designed to equip clinician learners with the skills to facilitate diabetes group visits.
methodsUsing the ADDIE model (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, Evaluation) as a guiding framework, we developed a 3-hour virtual training program for clinician learners at two community clinics. The training covered group visit facilitation and the logistics of 1:1 clinician-patient encounters. For the patient encounter component, we applied evidence-based guidelines, such as those from the American Diabetes Association, to create novel algorithms specifying low-cost medications for diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia. Training effectiveness was evaluated through learner participation (6-10 learners per site), knowledge improvement measured via pre- and post-tests, case studies, and learner feedback.
resultsClinics successfully met their clinician recruitment targets. Learners showed proficiency in applying the medication algorithms through five case studies. Knowledge improved significantly from the pretest (46.36%) to the posttest (92.95%) (p < 0.001). Learner feedback indicated high satisfaction with the training's structure, content, and relevance, particularly in relation to using the algorithms to manage diabetes in low-income settings. DISCUSSION: This study demonstrates the successful development of a diabetes group visit training for clinicians, as evidenced by recruitment success, knowledge improvement, and positive feedback. The low-cost medication algorithms served as a valuable resource for clinicians. CLINICAL TRIAL: NCT04835493.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.