ArticleBMC women's health2025
Validation of the menopause representation questionnaire (MenoSentations-Q) among Iranian women and cross-cultural comparison with Portuguese women.
Article in BMC women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Knowledge, Readiness, and Perception of Medical Students Toward Medical Artificial Intelligence: A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of medical education and curricular developmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMenopause represents a critical stage in middle. Examining menopausal symptoms within healthcare system requires reliable and valid instruments. The Menopause Representations Questionnaire (Menosentations-Q) is a self-report scale grounded in Leventhal's self-regulation model. This study aimed to explore the psychometric properties of this questionnaire among Iranian women.
methodsThis study was conducted with women visiting healthcare centers in Saveh, Markazi province, Iran. A total of 320 eligible Iranian women and 354 Portuguese women (aged 45-65) completed the questionnaire. Structural validity was assessed using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Internal consistency was evaluated through Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's omega. Convergent and divergent validity were determined using average shared variance, maximum shared variance, construct reliability, and Fornell and Larcker's method. Cross-cultural validity was performed by multigroup CFA to assess invariance between two culturally distinct samples (Iranian and Portuguese).
resultsThe Content Validity Ratio (CVR) and Content Validity Index (CVI) were 0.96 and 0.98, respectively, indicating strong content and face validity. EFA of 22 items revealed four factors-identity, positive and negative consequences, and control/awareness/cause factors, accounting for 61.29% of the total variance. CFA indicated good model fit (CFI = 0.96, TLI = 0.95, χ2/df = 1.74, GFI = 0.91, AGFI = 0.89, RMSEA = 0.04). Cronbach's alpha (0.90) and McDonald's omega (0.92) indicated good internal consistency. Convergent and discriminant validity values of MenoSentations-Q were also acceptable. Also, the instrument showed invariance between the two cultural groups.
conclusionsThe Persian adaptation of MenoSentations-Q demonstrated strong validity and reliability. Furthermore, the comparable responses between Portuguese and Iranian participants suggest shared representations of menopause across these cultures. Given the significance of menopause, tailored educational programs and interventions are essential to address potential challenges during this life stage. Employing standardized tools such as the Menopsentations-Q can support the development of effective strategies, including educational initiatives, support programs, and targeted interventions, to empower women and enhance their well-being during this transitional phase.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.