Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40001051›Full record

ArticleImplementation science : IS2025

Evidence based QUality Improvement for Prescribing Stewardship in ICU (EQUIPS-ICU): protocol for type III hybrid implementation-effectiveness study.

Duncan Wagstaff, John Amuasi, Sumaiya Arfin, Diptesh Aryal, Mohd Basri Mat Nor, Joseph Bonney, Arjen Dondorp, David Dongelmans, Layoni Dullawe, Fathima Fazla and 22 more

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science : IS, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT06666738 (Evidence Based QUality Improvement for Prescribing Stewardship in ICU), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06666738 not yet recruitingnot on this map

Evidence Based QUality Improvement for Prescribing Stewardship in ICU: Can a Structured Antimicrobial Review be Implemented in LMIC ICUs?

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of OxfordRan2024 to 2025Enrolled6,300ConditionsAntimicrobial StewardshipArmsStructured antimicrobial review
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

32 authors.

Duncan WagstaffCentre for Preoperative Medicine, University College London, London, UK. d.wagstaff@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-9472-1578
John AmuasiDepartment of Global Health, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana.
Sumaiya ArfinThe George Institute for Global Health, New Delhi, India.
Diptesh AryalDepartment of Critical Care, Nepal Intensive Care Research Foundation, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Mohd Basri Mat NorDepartment of Intensive Care Anaesthesiology, International Islamic University Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Joseph BonneyEmergency Medicine Department, Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital, Kumasi, Ghana.
Arjen DondorpMahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Bangkok, Thailand.
David DongelmansNational Intensive Care Evaluation (NICE) Foundation, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Layoni DullaweNat-Intensive Care Surveillance, Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
Fathima FazlaNat-Intensive Care Surveillance, Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
Aniruddha GhoseDepartment of Medicine, Chittagong Medical College Hospital, Chattogram, Bangladesh.
Eva HancilesConnaught Hospital, Freetown, Sierra Leone.
Rashan HaniffaMahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Bangkok, Thailand.
Madiha HashmiDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Ziauddin University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Adam Hewitt SmithFaculty of Health Sciences, Busitema University, Mbale, Uganda.
Bharath KumarDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Apollo Hospitals Educational and Research Foundation, Chennai, India.
Yen Lam MinhClinical Research Unit, Oxford University, University of Oxford, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Ramani MoonesingheCentre for Preoperative Medicine, University College London, London, UK.
Luigi PisaniMahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Bangkok, Thailand.
Cornelius SendagireD'Or Institute for Research and Education, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Mohd Shahnaz HasanDepartment of Intensive Care Anaesthesiology, International Islamic University Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Maryam Shamal GhalibGeneral Surgery, Wazir Akbar Khan Hospital, Kabul, Afghanistan.
Moses Siaw FrimpongDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital, Kumasi, Ghana.
Otavio RanzaniBarcelona Institute for Global Health, ISGlobal, Barcelona, Spain.
Menbeu SultanDepartment of Emergency Medicine and Critical Care, St. Paul's Hospital Millennium Medical College, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
David ThomsonDepartment of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Swagata TripathyPandemic Sciences Hub and Institute for Regeneration and Repair, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Louise ThwaitesClinical Research Unit, Oxford University, University of Oxford, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Rabiul Alam Md Erfan UddinDepartment of Medicine, Chittagong Medical College Hospital, Chattogram, Bangladesh.
Mohd Zulfakar MazlanHospital Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kota Bharu, Malaysia.
Wangari Waweru-SiikaDepartment of Anaesthesia, The Aga Khan University, Nairobi, Kenya.
Abigail BeaneMahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Bangkok, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundApproximately half of all antimicrobial prescriptions in intensive care units (ICUs) may be inappropriate, including those prescribed when not needed, in unnecessary combinations or for longer durations than needed. Inappropriate prescribing is costly, exposes patients to unnecessary side-effects and drives population-level antimicrobial resistance, the prevalence and consequences of which are greatest in low- and middle-income countries. However, the implementation of interventions to improve the appropriateness of antimicrobial prescribing has been variable and requires further study.

methodsWe propose a type III hybrid implementation/effectiveness interventional cohort trial in 35 ICUs in up to 11 low- and middle- income countries. The study intervention is a structured review of antimicrobial prescriptions as recommended by the World Health Organisation. Strategies to support stakeholder-led implementation include development of local protocols, registry-enabled audit and feedback, and education. Evaluation of implementation, and the determinants of its success, is informed by the RE-AIM framework and the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research respectively. The primary outcome is a composite measure of fidelity, reach and adoption. Secondary outcomes describe the effectiveness of the intervention on improving antimicrobial prescribing. Qualitative interviews will assess relevant implementation acceptability, adaptations and maintenance. A baseline survey will investigate ICU-level antimicrobial stewardship structures and processes. DISCUSSION: This study addresses global policy priorities by supporting implementation research of antimicrobial stewardship, and strengthening associated healthcare professional competencies. It does this in a setting where improvement is sorely needed: low- and middle- income country ICUs. The study will also describe the influence of pre-existing antimicrobial stewardship structures and processes on implementation and improve understanding about the efficacy of strategies to overcome barriers to implementation in these settings.

trial registrationThis study protocol has been registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (ref NCT06666738) on 31 Oct 2004. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06666738?term=NCT06666738&rank=1 .

Indexed as

Antimicrobial StewardshipInappropriate PrescribingIntensive Care UnitsQuality ImprovementHumansImplementation ScienceObservational Studies as TopicAntimicrobial ResistanceAntimicrobial StewardshipAudit & FeedbackCritical CareImplementationIntensive CareLow- and Middle- Income CountriesQuality Improvement

Identifiers

PMID40001051
PMCPMC11863957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.