Observational studyBMC psychiatry2025
Changes in inpatient mental health treatment and related costs before and after flexible assertive community treatment: a naturalistic observational cohort study.
Observational study in BMC psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assertive Community Treatment and ACT-Derived Outreach Models: A Scoping Review of Adaptations, Fidelity and Outcomes.Community mental health journal · 2026Article
- Preliminary Study of the Effectiveness of the GUIA Assertive Community Treatment Program for the Care of Young, Highly Complex Mental Health Patients.Community mental health journal · 2026Observational
- Cost Burden, Readmission Dynamics, and Service Management in Psychiatric Care: A Financial Performance Analysis in a Romanian Public Hospital.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Protection of human rights during involuntary treatment in mental healthcare services: A European perspective.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFlexible Assertive Community Treatment (FACT) is currently implemented in Norwegian mental health services, aiming to ensure comprehensive and rights-based services for persons with severe mental illness and complex needs, but also motivated by assumed cost-effectiveness. We need knowledge about the consequences of this service innovation. The aim of this study was to investigate changes in total and involuntary inpatient mental health treatment and associated changes in costs of inpatient days before and after enrolment into FACT for persons with severe mental illness and complex needs in Norway.
methodsIn this naturalistic observational cohort study of 397 patients in eight Norwegian FACT teams, we compared total and involuntary admissions, total and involuntary inpatient days, and the costs of total and involuntary inpatient days, for two periods: 24 months before and 24 months after enrolment in FACT. We used paired t-test.
resultsThere was a significant reduction in involuntary admissions, involuntary inpatient days, and total inpatient days after enrolment in FACT. We found a slight but non-significant reduction in total admissions to inpatient mental health treatment. There was a significant reduction in the costs of total inpatient days and involuntary inpatient days.
conclusionPatients in FACT were admitted to inpatient treatment as frequently as before enrolment in FACT, but involuntary admissions were less frequent. Furthermore, the duration of involuntary and total inpatient treatment was reduced, with a corresponding reduction in costs as expected. Results suggest that targeted and well-timed interventions from FACT may reduce the need for prolonged involuntary inpatient treatment, implying reduced disadvantages for the individual and more efficient allocation of health service funding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.