ArticleBMC gastroenterology2025
Machine learning for temporary stoma after intestinal resection in surgical decision-making of Crohn's disease.
Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Stoma formation and associated risk factors in patients with Crohn's disease in an Austrian tertiary referral hospital: a retrospective explorative study of long-term follow-up.Crohn's & colitis 360 · 2026Article
- Explainable random forest-SHAP framework for Montreal phenotype-stratified prediction of one-year complications in Crohn's disease.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCrohn's disease (CD) often necessitates surgical intervention, with temporary stoma creation after intestinal resection (IR) being a crucial decision. This study aimed to construct novel models based on machine learning (ML) to predict temporary stoma formation after IR for CD.
methodsPatient data who underwent IR for CD at our center between July 2017 and March 2023 were collected for inclusion in this retrospective study. Eligible CD patients were randomly divided into training and validation cohorts. Feature selection was executed using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator. We employed three ML algorithms including traditional logistic regression, novel random forest and XG-Boost to create prediction models. The area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision, recall, and F1 score were used to evaluate these models. SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) approach was used to assess feature importance.
resultsA total of 252 patients with CD were included in the study, 150 of whom underwent temporary stoma creation after IR. Eight independent predictors emerged as the most valuable features. An AUC between 0.886 and 0.998 was noted among the three ML algorithms. The random forest (RF) algorithms demonstrated the most optimal performance (0.998 in the training cohort and 0.780 in the validation cohort). By employing the SHAP method, we identified the variables that contributed to the model and their correlation with temporary stoma formation after IR for CD.
conclusionsThe proposed RF model showed a good predictive ability for identifying patients at high risk for temporary stoma formation after IR for CD, which can assist in surgical decision-making in CD management, provide personalized guidance for temporary stoma formation, and improve patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.