ArticleBMC bioinformatics2025
Bacterial network for precise plant stress detection and enhanced crop resilience.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding plant hormonal responses to stress and their transport dynamics remains challenging, limiting advancements in enhancing plant resilience. Our study presents a novel approach that utilizes genetically engineered bacteria (GEB) as molecular transceivers within plants, aiming to develop revolutionary agricultural biosensors. We focus on abscisic acid (ABA), a key hormone for plant growth and stress response. We propose using Escherichia coli (E. coli) engineered with PYR1-derived receptors that exhibit high affinity for ABA, triggering a bioluminescent response. Simulations investigate the detection time for ABA, bacterial diffusion within plant roots, advection effects through shoots, and chemotaxis in response to attractant gradients in leaves. Results indicate that higher ABA concentrations correlate with shorter response times, with an average of 431.52 s based on bioluminescence. The average internalization time for bacteria through a plant root area of 2 µm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.