ArticleBMC ophthalmology2025
Diurnal variations in corneal biomechanics in healthy young adults.
Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- CorvisThe British journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo assess the diurnal changes in corneal biomechanics in healthy young adults.
methodsAt Wenzhou Medical University Eye Hospital in China, a prospective case series. Each healthy subject had six Corvis ST examinations, from 10:00 on a first day to 6:00 on the following day, at 4-hour intervals. The data collected included the biomechanically corrected IOP (bIOP), the central corneal thickness (CCT) and six dynamic corneal response (DCR) parameters, namely deformation amplitude (DA), the ratio between DA values at the apex and 2 mm from the apex (DAR2), integrated inverse radius (IIR), the stiffness parameter at first applanation (SP-A1), Corvis biomechanical index (CBI) and the updated stress-strain index (SSIv2). A multilevel model was used to assess the changes in DCR parameters of patients over time during the examination period.
resultsSixty-one subjects were included and intra-operator reproducibility was good for most DCR parameters at the 6 time points. DA, DAR2, IIR and CBI showed small fluctuations during the 24-hour cycle with mean values of 0.1, 0.16, 0.34, and 0.04 units, respectively, while SP-A1 showed higher variations averaging 20.57 units and SSIv2 had the least fluctuation within 0.10 units during 24-hour cycle. After correcting for the effects of CCT and bIOP, the diurnal fluctuations in IIR, CBI and SSIv2 were not statistically significant, unlike the fluctuations in DA, DAR2 and SP-A1, which remained significant.
conclusionsCompared with the DA, DAR2, IIR and CBI, SP-A1 was more affected while SSIv2 was the less affected by the diurnal variations and associated corneal edema.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.