SynthesisBMC gastroenterology2025
The impact of pancreatic duct stent placement on the clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula rate for high-risk anastomoses: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Celiac axis stenosis as an overlooked extrapancreatic predictor of fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Risk factors and prediction model development for pancreatic fistula following splenectomy in Wilson's disease patients with portal hypertension.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Pancreatico-Jejunostomy Fistula After Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Where Do We Stand? Results from an International Survey.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo evaluate the impact of pancreatic duct stent outcomes on the prognosis of postoperative pancreatic fistula in patients with high-risk anastomoses.
methodsRandomized controlled trials were identified through comprehensive searches in Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase, and PubMed databases. Cochrane Collaboration's tool RoB2 was used to evaluate study quality. The presence of non-dilated main pancreatic duct and soft gland texture were used to identify high risk anastomoses. The primary outcome measured was clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula rate. The heterogeneity and sensitivity analyses were performed.
resultsSix studies (n = 476) were included. The pooled data showed no significant difference in the clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula rate between stented and nonstented groups for at least one high-risk factor out of two factors selected (p = 0.234). Patients with non-dilated main pancreatic duct who received stent placement had a lower clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula rate (RR = 0.582, 95%CI = 0.383-0.883, p = 0.011). In contrast, patients with soft pancreatic texture showed no significant difference between two groups (p = 0.879). After removing the study identified by sensitivity analysis as the origin of heterogeneity from general cohorts, the stented group had a lower clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula rate (RR = 0.608, 95%CI = 0.413-0.895, p = 0.012).
conclusionsThere is a lack of robust evidence to support pancreatic duct stent placement for high-risk anastomoses. Nevertheless, stent implantation may be beneficial for patients with non-dilated pancreatic duct or external stent drainage.
trial registrationThe protocol was registered in advance with PROSPERO (CRD42023471943).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.