SynthesisEvidence-based dentistry2025
Does the use of sports mouthguards influence salivary parameters and oral health indices? A systematic review.
Synthesis in Evidence-based dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo investigate whether the use of sports mouthguards (SMG) influences salivary parameters and oral health indices.
methodsElectronic searches were conducted across six major databases and two sources of gray literature in July 2024, with no restrictions on language or publication date. Interventional studies assessing oral parameters in participants with and without SMG were included. Risk of bias (ROB) was evaluated using the NIH-NHLBI Quality Assessment Tools for before-and-after studies. Descriptive synthesis was performed, and the certainty of evidence was assessed with the GRADE approach.
resultsFour studies met the inclusion criteria, encompassing a total of 202 male and female athletes aged 8 to 24 years. ROB ratings were classified as fair in three studies (75%) and poor in one study (25%). Evaluated salivary parameters included pH, stimulated and unstimulated flow rates, microbial count, saliva consistency, and buffering capacity. Additionally, oral indices such as full mouth plaque and bleeding scores were assessed. The studies demonstrated high heterogeneity in collection and analysis methods, outcome evaluation, and follow-up duration. Overall, the influence of SMG use on salivary pH (n = 4; 100%) and stimulated flow rate (n = 2; 100%) was inconclusive. SMG use did not affect microbial count (n = 2; 100%) or saliva consistency (n = 1; 100%) but was associated with a decrease in buffering capacity (n = 1; 100%). An increase was noted in unstimulated flow rate (n = 1; 100%) and oral indices (n = 1; 100%) with SMG use. The certainty of the evidence was rated as very low for all evaluated parameters.
conclusionSMG use appears to impact saliva's buffering capacity but does not influence its consistency or microbial count. Despite the limited literature and methodological limitations of existing studies, this systematic review provides insights that could inform the design of more rigorous primary research, ultimately strengthening the evidence base on this topic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40000884What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.