ArticlePediatric research2026
Congenital diaphragmatic hernia outcomes: navigating center-to-center variability in level 4 NICUs in the Children's Hospitals Neonatal Consortium.
Article in Pediatric research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study examined inter-center variation (ICV) in inpatient outcomes for infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH), aiming to contribute to quality metrics and clinical benchmarks in neonatal care.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed CDH cases from the Children's Hospitals Neonatal Consortium (CHNC) database (2010-2022), focusing on infants without prior surgical repair or discharge. Our outcomes of interest included inpatient survival, survival without ECMO, and hospital length of stay (LOS). We incorporated centers with ≥30 cases into multivariable models to adjust for patient and clinical factors.
resultsAnalysis of 3639 infants revealed significant ICV. Unadjusted inpatient survival rate was 76.5%, with ICV ranging from 55.4% to 90.7%. The composite outcome of survival without ECMO was 63.3% (ICV: 38.6-87.9%). The median LOS for survivors was 50 days (ICV: 29-68 days). Multivariable analyses confirmed these trends, indicating an 18-fold variation in survival, a 35-fold variation in survival without ECMO, and a 3.3-fold variation in LOS across centers (p < 0.001 for all).
conclusionThe treating center was a significant predictor of risk-adjusted inpatient outcomes for infants with CDH. These findings highlight substantial disparities in care and support the integration of these metrics into future research and quality improvement efforts in level IV NICUs. IMPACT STATEMENT: This study reveals considerable inter-center differences in CDH outcomes, contributing extensive, multicenter data to the existing body of literature. It underscores how center-specific practices affect survival and ECMO use, suggesting that organized high-level care could enhance outcomes for CDH patients. These insights lay the groundwork for center-specific quality improvement initiatives to elevate the standard of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.