ArticleScientific reports2025
Discovery of a new mitophagy-related gene signature for predicting the outlook and immunotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Decoding Mitophagy in Breast Cancer: Biological Mechanisms, Dual Roles, and Clinical Implications.Cells · 2026Review
- Crosstalk between mitophagy and breast cancer: mechanisms of action and clinical applications.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2026Review
- The multifaceted roles of mitochondria and their therapeutic transformation: a new perspective on triple-negative breast cancer treatment.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mitophagy is an essential cellular process that is conserved and crucial for maintaining cellular balance by selectively eliminating malfunctioning mitochondria. However, there is still limited knowledge regarding the influence of mitophagy-related genes (MRGs) on the prognosis and response to treatment of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). In here, the TCGA and GEO databases were used to acquire the transcriptomic and clinical information of patients with TNBC, correspondingly. Using LASSO and multivariable Cox regression analyses, a risk signature related to mitophagy was established based on the prognostic MRGs. The prognostic signature associated with mitophagy consisted of five genes (BSG, JMJD6, DNAJA3, DISC1, and SQSTM1) and independently predicted the prognosis of patients with TNBC, regardless of clinical factors (p < 0.05). Patients classified within the high-risk group demonstrated significantly lower overall survival rates when contrasted with those in the low-risk group. The model exhibited excellent performance in predicting survival and risk stratification, as evidenced by the receiver operating characteristic and C-index. The findings stayed unchanged following external validation. Moreover, we observed a notable variation in the tumor immune microenvironment among the different risk categories. Patients with a low risk of TNBC demonstrated a more favorable response to immunotherapy compared to patients with a high risk. In conclusion, our study uncovered the possible impacts of MRGs on the tumor microenvironment, clinical and pathological characteristics, and outlook of TNBC. The CRG-related signature was strongly linked to the immune response against TNBC and has the potential to serve as a valuable tool in predicting the prognosis and immunotherapy response of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.