ArticleScientific reports2025
Predicting 90-day risk of urinary tract infections following urostomy in bladder cancer patients using machine learning and explainability.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prediction models for sarcopenia in older adults in China: a scoping review.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Enhanced Feature Extraction for Detection and Classification of Kidney Abnormalities.Current medical imaging · 2026Article
- Predictors, trends and outcomes associated with urinary tract infections in intracerebral hemorrhage: insights from a National Inpatient Sample Study (2010-2022).European journal of medical research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This research aims to design and validate a machine learning model to predict the probability of urinary tract infections within 90 days post-urostomy in bladder cancer patients. Clinical and follow-up information from 317 patients who had urostomy procedures at the First Affiliated Hospital of Shanxi Medical University (May 2018-May 2024) were analyzed. The dataset were partitioned into training and testing sets, and feature selection was executed via the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator regression technique. Seven machine learning algorithms were employed: Logistic Regression, K-Nearest Neighbors, LightGBM, Random Forest, XGBoost, Support Vector Machine, and Multi-Layer Perceptron. Performance metrics for the model were assessed using multiple evaluation indicators, including AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, Positive Predictive Value, Negative Predictive Value, and F1 score. SHapley Additive exPlanations and Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations algorithms were applied for model interpretability. UTIs occurred in 22.08% of patients within 90 days after urostomy. The predictive model pinpointed eight important clinical features. Among the developed models, the SVM model demonstrated the best overall performance with AUC (0.835), accuracy (0.825), precision (0.583), recall (0.778), and F1 score (0.667). This model, designed to assess UTIs risk after urostomy in bladder cancer patients, has been deployed online for healthcare professionals at: https://zqmodel.shinyapps.io/shinydashboard_model/ .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.