ArticleScientific reports2025
Non-destructive detection of critical defects in additive manufacturing.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Non-destructive examination (NDE) based structural integrity assessment of additively manufactured (AM) metallic parts depends on the reliable detection of volumetric defects and the accurate representation of their detrimental features. Failure to detect critical defects and their features during NDE can result in dangerous non-conservativeness in fatigue design and part qualification, leading to dire engineering consequences. This work highlights an often overlooked property of X-ray computed tomography (XCT) in prevailing NDE practices, i.e., the dependence of the XCT efficacy on the shape of defects within a population, which can manifest in both the probability of their detection and the errors in characterizing their features. By examining an identical material volume of laser powder bed fused AlSi10Mg with XCT at different combinations of voxel size and coupon geometry, it is shown that the performance of XCT deteriorates more significantly for irregular-shaped defects, since their fine features tend to be lost. An approach to recover some important feature information of these irregular defects, such as size, using a distance-based criterion is proposed and is shown to enhance the sizing accuracy of these defects.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.