ArticleScientific reports2025
Phytochemical analysis of Asclepias syriaca L. leaf extract and its potential phytotoxic effect on some invasive weeds.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of allelopathic potentialities of an invasive taxon, Mesosphaerum suaveolens (L.) Kuntze, and bio-assay-guided identification of the involved allelochemicals.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Potential of Orally Administered Quercetin, Hesperidin, andInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Allelopathic activity ofFrontiers in plant science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Leaf extract of Asclepyas syriaca was utilized to investigate the phytotoxic effects on the germination and seedling growth of Amaranthus retroflexus L., Chenopodium album L., and Iva xanthifolia Nutt. and to evaluate the relative chlorophyll content and oxidative stress of these weeds growing in pots. The total content of phenols in the extract and its antioxidant activity were determined before bioassays. The TPC was 43.3 ± 1.5 mg GAE g
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.