Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40000776›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Transformer-based conditional generative transfer learning network for cross domain fault diagnosis under limited data.

Xiang Li, Jun Ma, Jiande Wu, Zhuorui Li, Zhengzhou Tan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xiang LiFaculty of Information Engineering and Automation, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, 650500, China.
Jun MaFaculty of Information Engineering and Automation, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, 650500, China. mjun@kust.edu.cn.
Jiande WuSchool of Engineering, and Yunnan Key Laboratory of Intelligent Systems and Computing, Yunnan University, Kunming, 650500, China. wjiande@kust.edu.cn.
Zhuorui LiFaculty of Information Engineering and Automation, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, 650500, China.
Zhengzhou TanDepartment of Science and Information Technology, China Copper Co., Ltd, Kunming, 650001, China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China U23A20329Yunnan Fundamental Research Projects 202401AW070014Yunnan Fundamental Research Projects 202401BN070001-007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most current generative adversarial network (GAN) cannot simultaneously consider the quality and diversity of generated samples due to limited data and variable working condition. To solve the problem, a Transformer-based conditional GAN transfer learning network is proposed. Firstly, a transformer-based conditional GAN (TCGAN) generative network is constructed with sample label information, enhancing the quality of generated data while retaining the diversity of generated signals. Secondly, a transfer learning network based on TCGAN is established, and a "generation-transfer" collaborative training strategy based on the expectation maximization is introduced to realize parallel updating of the parameters of the generative network and the transfer network. Finally, the effectiveness of the proposed method is verified using bearing datasets from CWRU and the self-made KUST-SY. The results show that the proposed method can generate higher quality data than comparative methods such as TTS-GAN and CorGAN, which provides a new solution for improving the cross-domain fault diagnosis performance.

Indexed as

Cross-domain fault diagnosisGenerative adversarial networkRolling bearingTraining strategyTransformer

Identifiers

PMID40000776
PMCPMC11861598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.