ArticleScientific reports2025
Machine learning for early diagnosis of Kawasaki disease in acute febrile children: retrospective cross-sectional study in China.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Kawasaki Disease: Unraveling Immunopathogenesis, Genetic Factors, and AI Applications in Diagnosis with a Focus on Iran.Pediatric cardiology · 2026Review
- Interpretable machine learning analysis for relationships betweenFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Study of a Kawasaki disease diagnostic prediction model based on the LightGBM machine learning algorithm.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Assessment and prediction models for the quantitative and qualitative reserve of the ovary using machine learning.Journal of ovarian research · 2025Article
- Identification of potential biomarkers associated with immune cell infiltration patterns in Kawasaki disease via bioinformatics.PloS one · 2025Article
- Polymorphism-driven immune disruptions in Kawasaki disease across populations: decoding the role of T and B-cells.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Early diagnosis of Kawasaki disease (KD) allows timely treatment to be initiated, thereby preventing coronary artery aneurysms in children. However, it is challenging due to the subjective nature of the diagnostic criteria. This study aims to develop a machine learning prediction model using routine blood tests to distinguish children with KD from other febrile illnesses in Chinese children within the first five days of fever onset. The retrospective cross-sectional data for this study was collected from the records of Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, spanning January 1, 2020, to April 30, 2024. A retrospective analysis was performed using three machine learning models and five ensemble models based on this dataset. This study included 1,089 children with KD (mean age 32.8 ± 27.0 months; 34.5% female) and a control group of 81,697 children without KD (mean age 45.3 ± 33.6 months; 42.8% female). The supervised method, Xtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), was applied. It was tested without feature selection, achieved an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.9999, sensitivity of 0.9982, specificity of 0.9975, F1 score of 0.9979, accuracy of 0.9979, positive predictive value (PPV) of 0.9975, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 0.9982. The SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) summary plot identified the top five significant features, which were the percentage of eosinophils (EO%), hematocrit (HCT), platelet crit (PCT), gender, and absolute basophil count (BA#). This study demonstrates that the application of the machine learning model, XGBoost, on routine blood test results can predict KD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.