ArticleScientific reports2025
A feature explainability-based deep learning technique for diabetic foot ulcer identification.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI-Enhanced System for Diabetic Foot Ulcer Localization and Classification Using Multi-Scale Neural CNN Model.Health science reports · 2026Article
- AI-Based Models for Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment: Scoping Review.JMIR diabetes · 2026Review
- An AI-driven framework for diabetic foot ulcer classification, segmentation, and depth estimation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Proposed dense variational autoencoder model integrated with contrastive learning for foot ulcer classification.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Clinical applications of machine learning for infection assessment in diabetic foot ulcers.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Review
- Advances in Image-Based Diagnosis of Diabetic Foot Ulcers Using Deep Learning and Machine Learning: A Systematic Review.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Interpreting Venous and Arterial Ulcer Images Through the Grad-CAM Lens: Insights and Implications in CNN-Based Wound Image Classification.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The emerging role of probiotics in the management and treatment of diabetic foot ulcer: a comprehensive review.AIMS microbiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are a common and serious complication of diabetes, presenting as open sores or wounds on the sole. They result from impaired blood circulation and neuropathy associated with diabetes, increasing the risk of severe infections and even amputations if untreated. Early detection, effective wound care, and diabetes management are crucial to prevent and treat DFUs. Artificial intelligence (AI), particularly through deep learning, has revolutionized DFU diagnosis and treatment. This work introduces the DFU_XAI framework to enhance the interpretability of deep learning models for DFU labeling and localization, ensuring clinical relevance. The framework evaluates six advanced models-Xception, DenseNet121, ResNet50, InceptionV3, MobileNetV2, and Siamese Neural Network (SNN)-using interpretability techniques like SHAP, LIME, and Grad-CAM. Among these, the SNN model excelled with 98.76% accuracy, 99.3% precision, 97.7% recall, 98.5% F1-score, and 98.6% AUC. Grad-CAM heat maps effectively identified ulcer locations, aiding clinicians with precise and visually interpretable insights. The DFU_XAI framework integrates explainability into AI-driven healthcare, enhancing trust and usability in clinical settings. This approach addresses challenges of transparency in AI for DFU management, offering reliable and efficient solutions to this critical healthcare issue. Traditional DFU methods are labor-intensive and costly, highlighting the transformative potential of AI-driven systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.