ArticleScientific reports2025
Multilayer analysis of ethnically diverse blood and urine biomarkers for breast cancer risk and prognosis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advances in hydrogel-based materials for breast cancer bone metastasis: from targeted drug delivery to bone microenvironment remodeling.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Breast cancer (BC) is one of the most common malignancies among women globally, characterized by complex pathogenesis involving various biomarkers present in blood and urine. To enhance understanding of the genetic associations between biomarkers and BC via multidimensional, cross ethnic investigations. Based on GWAS data of 35 blood and urine biomarkers from European populations, we adopted multiple analysis strategies including univariable Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis, reverse MR analysis, sensitivity analysis and multivariate MR to identify potential biomarkers associated with BC risk and survival. Our initial analysis included 122,977 BC and 105,974 controls of European ancestry. Building upon these findings, we conducted cross ethnic validation by applying the same analyses to East Asian populations using data from the IEU GWAS database, which included 5,552 BC and 89,731 controls. This step allowed us to investigate the universality and heterogeneity of our identified biomarkers across different ancestries. Subsequently, utilizing clinical laboratory detection data from multiple regions in China, we performed differential analyses and survival assessments on these potential biomarkers to evaluate their clinical relevance and utility. Notably, we leveraged Luzhou's clinical data to integrate HDL-C with conventional tumor markers (CEA, CA125, CA153) into a machine learning model, comparing its diagnostic efficacy against tumor marker combination. Our study validated associations of ALP, HDL-C, TG, SHBG, and IGF-1 with BC risk, reinforcing the reliability of these findings. Moreover, notable interethnic disparities emerged in the association between HDL-C and BC risk, where in HDL-C demonstrates a contrasting role: acting as a genetic protective agent against BC and suggesting promise as an auxiliary diagnostic marker in East Asian populations, yet inversely, it serves as a genetic dangerous predictor in European populations. Analyzing BC subtypes, we identified associations of HDL-C, TG, SHBG, and CRP with ER
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.