Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40000703›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Neonatal and maternal dietary interventions driving microbiota and functionality in piglet gut compartments.

Dirkjan Schokker, Mariëlle H van den Esker, Alex Bossers, Janneke G Allaart, Hubèrt van Hees, Astrid de Greeff, Johanna M J Rebel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Dirkjan SchokkerWageningen Bioveterinary Research, Lelystad, The Netherlands. dirkjan.schokker@wur.nl.
Mariëlle H van den EskerWageningen Bioveterinary Research, Lelystad, The Netherlands.
Alex BossersWageningen Bioveterinary Research, Lelystad, The Netherlands.
Janneke G AllaartWageningen Bioveterinary Research, Lelystad, The Netherlands.
Hubèrt van HeesTrouw Nutrition Research and Development, Boxmeer, The Netherlands.
Astrid de GreeffWageningen Bioveterinary Research, Lelystad, The Netherlands.
Johanna M J RebelWageningen Bioveterinary Research, Lelystad, The Netherlands.

Funding

Ministerie van Economische Zaken TKI-AF12039B
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Feed additives aiming to improve gastrointestinal health are frequently supplied to piglets after weaning (d28) but might be more effective when administered before weaning. In this period, feed additives can either be administered directly to neonates, or indirectly via sow's feed. It is yet unknown what the effect of the administration route is on gut functionality and health in the piglets. Therefore, we compared the effect of different dietary interventions on gut functionality after maternal administration (lactation feed) to the neonatal administration route (oral gavage). These feed interventions included medium chain fatty acids (MCFA), beta-glucans (BG), and galacto-oligosaccharides (GOS). For the maternal administration route, MCFA showed a significant difference in alpha diversity parameter, observed species at d1 and one differentially expressed gene (DEG), and 99 DEG at d31. Pathway enrichment analysis showed association to immune processes and metabolism. For BG, only 21 DEG were observed at d31, these DEGs were associated to signal transduction and sympathetic nerve pathway. For GOS, 816 DEG were observed for GOS at d1, and 77 at d31, where DEGs at d1 were associated to immune processes. For the neonatal administration route, MCFA showed 94 DEG and GOS 6 DEG. Where DEGs in MCFA were mainly associated to cell adhesion processes. When comparing the administration routes directly between treatment groups, we observed significant differences in alpha diversity parameters, observed species at d31 for MCFA, Shannon for GOS, as well as for beta diversity in GOS. For MCFA 515 DEG were observed, for BG 503 DEG, and for GOS 996 DEG. Where for MCFA most pathways were associated to immunological processes, BG showed more metabolism, and GOS mainly metabolism with a few immunological processes. The type of intervention and the administration route influence gut functionality of the piglets. MCFA administration led to a more differentially orchestrated response when comparing the neonatal and maternal administration route then the other two additives. This implies that for each nutritional intervention in early life of a pig the optimal route of administration needs to be determined.

Indexed as

Animal FeedDietGastrointestinal MicrobiomeGastrointestinal TractAnimalsAnimals, Newbornbeta-GlucansFatty AcidsFemaleOligosaccharidesSwinebeta-GlucansFatty AcidsOligosaccharidesDietary interventionGut developmentGut functionalityIntestinal gene expressionMicrobiotaPigs

Identifiers

PMID40000703
PMCPMC11861315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.