Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40000584›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic innovation & regulatory science2025

Optimizing Quality Tolerance Limits Monitoring in Clinical Trials Through Machine Learning Methods.

Lei Yan, Ziji Yu, Liwen Wu, Rachael Liu, Jianchang Lin

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lei YanDepartment of Statistics, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA.
Ziji YuTakeda Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, MA, USA. ziji.yu@takeda.com.
Liwen WuTakeda Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Rachael LiuTakeda Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Jianchang LinTakeda Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The traditional clinical trial monitoring process, which relies heavily on site visits and manual review of accumulative patient data reported through Electronic Data Capture system, is time-consuming and resource-intensive. The recently emerged risk-based monitoring (RBM) and quality tolerance limit (QTL) framework offers a more efficient alternative solution to traditional SDV (source data verification) based quality assurance. These frameworks aim at proactively identifying systematic issues that impact patient safety and data integrity. In this paper, we proposed a machine learning enabled approach to facilitate real-time, automated monitoring of clinical trial QTL risk assessment. Unlike the traditional quality assurance process, where QTLs are evaluated based on single-source data and arbitrary defined fixed threshold, we utilize the QTL-ML framework to integrate information from multiple clinical domains to predict the QTL of variety types at clinical program, study, site and patient level. Moreover, our approach is assumption-free, relying not on historical expectations but on dynamically accumulating trial data to predict quality tolerance limit risks in an automated manner. Embedded within ICH-E6 recommended RBM principles, this innovative machine learning solution for QTL monitoring has the potential to transform sponsors' ability to protect patient safety, reduce trial duration, and lower trial costs.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicMachine LearningHumansRisk AssessmentGood clinical practiceMachine learningQuality tolerance limitsRisk-based monitoring

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.