Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40000572›Full record

ArticleBiochemical genetics2026

Comparative Pan- and Phylo-Genomic Analysis of Ideonella and Thermobifida Strains: Dissemination of Biodegradation Potential and Genomic Divergence.

Arockiyajainmary Michealsamy, Saranya Jayapalan

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Biochemical genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Arockiyajainmary MichealsamyIndependent Researcher, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. arockiyajainmary13@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9503-7073
Saranya JayapalanDepartment of Bioinformatics, Pondicherry University, Puducherry, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5342-565X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ideonella and Thermobifida were the most promising bacterial candidates for degrading plastic polymers. A comparative pan- and phylogenomic analysis of 33 Ideonella and Thermobifida strains was done to determine their plastic degradation potential, niche adaptation and speciation. Our study disclosed that more accessory genes in the strains showed phenotypic plasticity, according to the BPGA data. Pan and core genes were employed for the phylogenetic reconstruction. Pathway enrichment analyses scrutinized the functional roles of the core and adaptive-associated genes. KEGG annotation revealed that most genes were associated with the metabolism of amino acids and carbohydrates. The detailed COG analysis disclosed that approximately 40% of the pan genes performed metabolic functions. The unique gene pool consisted of genes chiefly involved in "general function prediction" and "amino acid transport and metabolism". Our in silico study revealed that these strains could assist in agronomic applications in the future since they devour nitrogen compounds and their central metabolic pathways are involved in amino acid metabolism. The rational selection of strains of Ideonella is far more effective at depolymerising plastics than Thermobifida. A greater number of unique genes, 1701 and 692, were identified for Ideonella sakaiensis 201-F6 and Thermobifida alba DSM-43795, respectively. Furthermore, we examined the singletons involved in xenobiotic catabolism. The unique singleton data were used to construct a supertree. To characterize the conserved patterns, we used SMART and MEME to identify domain and transmembrane regions in the unique protein sequences. Therefore, our study unraveled the genomic insights into the ecology-driven speciation of Ideonella and Thermobifida.

Indexed as

ActinobacteriaGenome, BacterialPhylogenyBiodegradation, EnvironmentalGenomicsBiodegradationFunctional annotationPangenomePhylogenyXenobiotic degradation

Identifiers

PMID40000572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.