SynthesisAnnals of surgical oncology2025
The Role of Specialty Palliative Care in Elective Surgical Oncology: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Annals of surgical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patient Perceptions of Palliative Care in Surgery: A Qualitative Study.Journal of pain and symptom management · 2026Article
- Understanding Surgeon Engagement with Palliative Care Practices for Seriously Ill Patients: A Qualitative Study.Annals of surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUnlike advanced cancer populations, for whom early and routine specialty palliative care (PC) referral has demonstrated clear benefits for quality of life and symptom control, evidence supporting PC for patients undergoing curative-intent cancer surgery has been inconclusive.
methodA systematic review of the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and MEDLINE databases was performed to identify all studies evaluating the role of PC for patients undergoing curative-intent surgery for cancer.
resultsAmong the 12,886 publications initially retrieved, 14 met all inclusion criteria: two cross-sectional studies comprised of physician surveys, four cohort studies, five qualitative studies, one prospective trial, and two randomized controlled trials (RCTs). In non-randomized studies, PC was associated with increased advanced care planning and symptom control; however, both the PERIOP-PC and SCOPE RCTs found no significant improvement in quality of life with routine perioperative PC among patients undergoing major abdominal cancer surgery. Qualitative studies characterized patient experiences and physician perspectives of PC.
conclusionThis systematic review summarizes the existing literature on the role of PC in surgical oncology, highlighting the unique considerations and unmet needs of surgical patients that differ from those with advanced cancer. While the routine use of perioperative PC for patients undergoing cancer surgery is not supported, future research should focus on identifying high-risk patients who would most benefit from specialty PC and innovative methods of delivering supportive care in surgical oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.