Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40000543›Full record

ArticleArchives of sexual behavior2025

Possible Differences in Visual Attention to Faces in the Context of Mate Choice and Competition.

Žaneta Pátková, Dominika Grygarová, Petr Adámek, Jitka Třebická Fialová, Jan Havlíček, Vít Třebický

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of sexual behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Žaneta PátkováFaculty of Science, Charles University, Viničná 7, 128 44, Prague, Czech Republic. zaneta.patkova@natur.cuni.cz.ORCID 0000-0002-7337-3815
Dominika GrygarováCenter for Advanced Studies of Brain and Consciousness, National Institute of Mental Health, Klecany, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-2883-4712
Petr AdámekCenter for Advanced Studies of Brain and Consciousness, National Institute of Mental Health, Klecany, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-7787-0755
Jitka Třebická FialováFaculty of Science, Charles University, Viničná 7, 128 44, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-2419-7461
Jan HavlíčekFaculty of Science, Charles University, Viničná 7, 128 44, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-2374-7337
Vít TřebickýFaculty of Science, Charles University, Viničná 7, 128 44, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-1440-1772

Funding

Grantová Agentura České Republiky 19/11822S
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Existing research indicates that the shape of various facial regions is linked to perceived attractiveness and perceived formidability. Interestingly, little evidence shows that people directly focus on these specific facial regions during judgments of attractiveness and formidability, and there is little support for the notion that the levels of attractiveness and formidability affect raters' visual attention. We employed eye-tracking to examine visual attention (the number of fixations and dwell time) in 40 women and 37 men, while they assessed 45 male faces in life-sized photographs for attractiveness and formidability. The facial photographs were grouped by varying levels of attractiveness and formidability (low, medium, and high). Our results showed that regardless of the characteristics rated, both men and women paid the most visual attention to the eyes, nose, mouth, and forehead regions. We found statistically discernible variation in visual attention in relation to the rater's sex or target's attractiveness levels for other facial features (the chin, cheeks, or ears), but these differences may not be substantial enough to have practical implications. We suggest that the eyes, the nose, and the mouth regions play a central role in the evolution of face perception as regions most salient to the acquisition of informative cues about others. Further, during both attractiveness and formidability judgments, men looked longer at the stimuli than women did, which may hint at increased difficulty of this task for men, possibly because they compare themselves with the stimuli. Additionally, irrespective of sex, raters looked marginally longer at faces with a medium level of formidability than at those with a high formidability level, which may reflect ambiguity of these stimuli and uncertainty regarding assessment. We found no other significantly relationships between the target's attractiveness and formidability levels and the rater's visual attention to whole faces.

Indexed as

AttentionBeautyChoice BehaviorCompetitive BehaviorFaceFacial RecognitionVisual PerceptionAdultEye-Tracking TechnologyFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultAttractivenessEye-trackingFormidabilityIntersexual selectionIntrasexual selection

Identifiers

PMID40000543
PMCPMC11926017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.