ArticleSports medicine - open2025
Translation and Validation of the Portuguese Version of the Rating-of-Fatigue Scale.
Article in Sports medicine - open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Arabic Rating-of-Fatigue Scale.Sports medicine - open · 2026Article
- A Short Maximal Effort Induces Greater Low-Frequency Fatigue than Prolonged Cycling in Highly-Trained Road Cyclists.International journal of exercise science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe Rating-of-Fatigue (ROF) scale is a validated tool to measure changes in perceived fatigue in sports and everyday contexts; thus, this study aimed to translate and validate the Portuguese version of the ROF scale. For this, the study was composed of three phases. Phase 1 involved a comprehensive translation of the ROF scale into Portuguese, followed by a back-translation and a consolidation process to obtain the final version of the ROF scale in Portuguese. In phase 2, the face validity of the scale was assessed. Seventy-three native Portuguese speakers responded to a series of Likert scale items designed to evaluate the purpose of the scale and assess whether it accurately measured the intended construct. In the final phase, the convergent and divergent validity of the scale was assessed during an incremental cycling test to exhaustion, followed by 10 min of passive recovery and a subsequent repetition of the initial 5 min of the test. The study was conducted between October 2023 and June 2024 in Portugal.
resultsThe results from phase 1 indicated a high level of comparability and interpretability between the original and back-translated versions, with only minor adjustments made to finalize the Portuguese version of the ROF scale. In phase 2, a high level of face validity was observed. The median score for the item "measures fatigue" was (median [IQR]) was 3.0 [3.0, 4.0] out of 4. After participants were provided with the scale instructions, the face validity score improved significantly (4.0 [3.0, 4.0]; p = 0.001). In phase 3, during the incremental test, very large correlations were observed between ROF, and key physiological and performance indicators, including rating of perceived exertion (RPE), heart rate, oxygen consumption, and power output. Discriminant validity between ROF and RPE was found during the recovery.
conclusionsThe present study indicates that the Portuguese version of the ROF maintains the properties of the original version and can be used effectively in the Portuguese language.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.