SynthesisHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2025
Is the recurrence rate higher in obese patients undergoing inguinal hernia surgery?
Synthesis in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Preoperative predictors of chronic pain after laparoendoscopic groin hernia repair: A Swedish Hernia Registry study.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to evaluate whether obese patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair surgery have a higher recurrence rate and compare the clinical outcomes of obese and non-obese patients. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe databases of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were used to search for eligible studies from inception to November 1, 2024. Mean difference (MD), Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (Cl) were pooled up to analyze. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) scores were used to evaluate the quality of the included studies. This study was performed with Stata (V.16.0) software.
resultsA total of nine studies involving 56,833 patients were included in this study. By comparing the baseline information, we found that the obese group had Fewer older (MD=-0.08, I²=62.41%, 95%CI=-0.16 to -0.00, P = 0.04), higher BMI (MD = 2.45, I²=93.67%, 95%CI = 2.08 to 2.81, P < 0.01), more hypertension patients (OR = 1.32, I²=32.96%, 95%CI = 1.02 to 1.67, P = 0.04), more BPH (OR = 0.68, I²=0.00%, 95%CI = 0.49 to 0.94, P = 0.02) and more local anesthesia (OR = 0.82, I²=14.73%, 95%CI = 0.79 to 0.86, P < 0.01) than the none-obese group. In terms of postoperative outcomes, We found that the obese group had higher recurrence rate (OR = 1.27, I²=21.89%, 95%CI = 1.10 to 1.47, P < 0.01), more wound infection (OR = 1.43, I²=0.00%, 95%CI = 1.20 to 1.69, P < 0.01), and more overall complications (OR = 1.12, I²=28.20%, 95%CI = 1.05 to 1.20, P < 0.01).
conclusionCompared with the non-obese group, the obese group has a higher recurrence rate, more wound infections, and overall more complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40000506What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.