Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40000496›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2025

A qualitative descriptive study on the perspectives and experiences of multidisciplinary HCPs in providing nutritional care to older adults with cancer.

Rachel Li Yin Wong, Chad Yixian Han, Jolene Thomas, Reegan Knowles

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rachel Li Yin WongNutrition and Dietetics, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Sturt Road, Bedford Park SA5042, Adelaide, Australia.
Chad Yixian HanCaring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Science, Flinders University, Sturt Road, Bedford Park SA5042, Adelaide, Australia.
Jolene ThomasNutrition and Dietetics, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Sturt Road, Bedford Park SA5042, Adelaide, Australia.
Reegan KnowlesCaring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Science, Flinders University, Sturt Road, Bedford Park SA5042, Adelaide, Australia. reegan.knowles@flinders.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo explore the perceptions and experiences of healthcare professionals (HCPs) caring for older adults with cancer regarding dietary advice provision and dietetic referral.

methodsQualitative descriptive study providing rich descriptions of the experiences of multidisciplinary HCPs in providing care to older adults with cancer, excluding dietitians or nutritionists. Purposive and snowball sampling methods were used for recruitment. Semi-structured interviews and a focus group session were conducted. Data was analysed using qualitative content analysis. Inductive codes were generated, and codes representing factors influencing HCPs' referral to dietetics and dietary advice provision were then mapped to domains in the Tailored Implementation of Chronic Diseases (TICD) checklist using a deductive approach.

resultsTwenty HCPs across various Australian healthcare settings participated, with a broad range of working experience (1.5 to 53 years) being interviewed. Most participants perceived their role in the provision of general dietary advice, and there was a consensus that nutrition is important. Key barriers (e.g. lack of time and resources, perceived lack of knowledge, scope of practice), including unique patient-related barriers (e.g. co-morbidities, fatalistic mindset), and key facilitators (e.g. need for education, evidence-based resources, multidisciplinary team approach) to dietary advice provision fell within five TICD domains (intervention, health professional factors, patient factors, professional interactions, incentives and resources). Common barriers (e.g. disconnections in multidisciplinary care, lack of structured referral pathways) and facilitators (e.g. clear referral pathways) to referral fell within four TICD domains (intervention, health professional factors, professional interactions, incentives and resources).

conclusionThe barriers and facilitators to referral and provision of dietary advice by HCPs suggest the need for system-level changes via a multi-pronged approach. Simple and accessible nutrition resources, stronger nutrition education for HCPs, improved referral pathways and role clarity are required to support a multidisciplinary approach to nutritional care. More qualitative research on patient-level factors involving older adults with cancer is warranted.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelHealth PersonnelNeoplasmsAdultAgedAustraliaDieteticsFemaleFocus GroupsHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchReferral and ConsultationCancerDietary adviceDietetic referralHealthcare professionalsNutrition educationOlder adults

Identifiers

PMID40000496
PMCPMC11861013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.