Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40000492›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nutrition2025

The potential impact of the extended vitamin D fortification policy during pregnancy varies by continent of origin - a population-representative Swedish cohort.

Mathilda Forsby, Anna Winkvist, Ciara Mooney, Frida Dangardt, Jenny M Kindblom, Linnea Bärebring, Hanna Augustin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mathilda ForsbyDepartment of Internal Medicine and Clinical Nutrition, Institute of Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden. mathilda.forsby@gu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1339-7292
Anna WinkvistDepartment of Internal Medicine and Clinical Nutrition, Institute of Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9122-7240
Ciara MooneyDepartment of Internal Medicine and Clinical Nutrition, Institute of Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Frida DangardtDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4632-3916
Jenny M KindblomDepartment of Internal Medicine and Clinical Nutrition, Institute of Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8437-0639
Linnea BärebringDepartment of Internal Medicine and Clinical Nutrition, Institute of Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1612-1697
Hanna AugustinDepartment of Internal Medicine and Clinical Nutrition, Institute of Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9795-3814

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe aimed to explore the potential impact of Sweden's extended fortification policy, launched in 2018, on vitamin D intake during pregnancy, depending on continent of origin.

methodsThe population-representative GraviD cohort was conducted within the antenatal care in 2013-2014 in Southwestern Sweden. Background data including country of origin were collected through questionnaires. In the third trimester, participants (N = 1761) answered a vitamin D questionnaire which included intakes of margarine, milk, and fermented milk. Reported vitamin D intake in 2013-2014 was compared to simulated vitamin D intake following the 2018 vitamin D fortification policy expansion.

resultsPre-expansion reported median intake of vitamin D from fortified foods differed by continent of origin (p < 0.001). Pre-expansion intake was highest among participants from Northern Europe (2.4 µg/day) compared to those from Continental Europe (2.0 µg/day, p = 0.002), Asia (1.6 µg/day, p < 0.001), and Africa (2.0 µg/day, p = 0.001). Post-expansion simulated median vitamin D intake from fortified foods was higher among participants from Northern Europe (6.3 µg/day) compared to Asia (5.0 µg/day, p < 0.001) and Africa (5.0 µg/day, p = 0.013). Participants from Continental Europe had the largest change (3.6 µg/day) between pre- and post-expansion, while those born in Asia had the smallest change (2.9 µg/day).

conclusionThe Swedish fortification policy expansion had a positive potential impact on vitamin D intake during pregnancy, but the effect depended on the continent of origin. The potential impact was smallest for participants from Asia and Africa, indicating that the current Swedish fortification policy is most beneficial for individuals of European origin.

Indexed as

Food, FortifiedNutrition PolicyVitamin DAdultCohort StudiesDietEuropeFemaleHumansPregnancySurveys and QuestionnairesSwedenVitamin D DeficiencyVitamin DDairy products.DietFood fortifiedMaternal healthNutrientsPregnant women

Identifiers

PMID40000492
PMCPMC11861403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.