ArticleJournal of molecular modeling2025
DFT-calculations and RDG analysis (topology) of complexes between glutathione and nucleic bases of pyrymidine series.
Article in Journal of molecular modeling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Hydrogen-bonded complexes of glycyl-l-glutamate with nucleosides: a dft and qtaim study.Journal of molecular modeling · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
contextInteractions between proteins and RNA, as well as between their structural fragments, are widespread in biological objects. We obtained the optimized structures of complexes of the glutathione anion with neutral molecules of uracil, thymine and cytosine. It was established that all complexes are stabilized by hydrogen bonds. The preference for various H-donors in nucleic base molecules (HN(1) or HN(3) in uracyl and thymine, N(1) or H2N in cytosine) for hydrogen bonding with the peptide has been analyzed. Chain elongation from dipeptide to tripeptide creates favorable conditions for increasing the number of hydrogen bonds in the complex. The strongest hydrogen bonds are formed with the carboxylate group of the peptide. Energy advantage of complexation with cytosine compared to other pyrimidine bases, and advantage of complexation with thymine compared to uracil have been established. The contributions of structural rearrangement of molecules, intermolecular interactions and H-bonding to the total values of potential energy and Gibbs energy of the complexation process have been discussed.
methodsThe article combines the results of calculations by the DFT/ B97D/6-311 + + G(3d,3p) and QTAIM methods to model the structure of ion-molecular complexes between the tripolar anion of peptide (glutathione) and neutral nucleic bases (uracil, thymine, cytosine). The PCM was used for solvent (water). Conformational analysis of the glutathione molecule was performed by scanning the potential energy while varying the dihedral angles. Several initial structure of peptide - nucleic base complexes with different modes of coordination were created in accordance with the MEP results. Non-covalent specific interactions in the complex were highlighted by RDG analysis. The hydrogen bond energies in complexes were calculated based on the correlation with the electron density at bond critical points. Changes in the total energy and Gibbs energy during complex formation, as well as contributions from intermolecular interactions and structural rearrangement of reagent molecules, were determined.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40000490What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.