ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2025
Comparison of the clinical outcomes after manual capsulorhexis on one eye and precision pulse capsulotomy on the other eye.
Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo compare the clinical outcomes after manual continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis (CCC) on one eye and precision pulse capsulotomy (PPC) on the other eye in cataract surgery.
methods60 eyes from 30 patients who underwent manual capsulorhexis on one eye (CCC group, N = 30) and precision pulse capsulotomy on the other eye (PPC group, N = 30) were retrospectively enrolled. Uncorrected and corrected visual acuity, manifest refraction, and corneal endothelial cell density were evaluated.
resultsThere were also no significant differences between the two groups according to the change in the corneal endothelial cell density at 3 months after cataract surgery (p > 0.05). The horizontal diameter (mm) and area (mm2) of the capsulotomy of the PPC group were significantly smaller than those of the CCC at postoperative 1 day and 3 months (P < 0.05). The circularity of PPC group was significantly better than that of the CCC at postoperative 1 day and 3 months (P < 0.05) (Table 4). Postoperative reduction of the capsulotomy area of the PPC group (6.64 ± 1.47) was higher than that of the CCC group (3.48 ± 1.21) from 1 day to 3 months after cataract surgery (P < 0.05).
conclusionsPPC was as safe as CCC and more efficient than CCC for making perfectly round capsulotomy. The initial capsulotomy size of PPC was smaller than that of CCC. PPC size decreased more than CCC after several months because it might damage the anterior capsule with thermal energy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40000472What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.