Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40000448›Full record

SynthesisEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2025

Assessment and early investigation of cauda equina syndrome- a systematic review of existing international guidelines and summary of the current evidence.

Orla Hennessy, A T Devitt, K Synnott, M Timlin

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Cauda equina syndrome: a structured approach for the higher orthopaedic examination.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Orla HennessyDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedics, University Hospital Galway, Galway, Ireland. o.hennessy95@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-4249-1974
A T DevittDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedics, University Hospital Galway, Galway, Ireland.
K SynnottNational Spinal Injuries Unit, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
M TimlinNational Spinal Injuries Unit, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background contextCauda Equina Syndrome (CES) is an emergency clinical syndrome with correlating radiological evidence of spinal compression. Urgent recognition and treatment is key. In many units, it lacks a clear pathway of investigation and referral, despite a constantly expanding evidence base for its management. PURPOSE: The aim of this article is to provide a systematic review of currently available guidelines internationally, and also an up-to-date review of current key evidence on topics central to the accurate assessment and investigation of CES. STUDY

designA systematic review of the literature was carried out to identify all previously published or proposed pathways internationally for CES.

methodsIncluded articles were reviewed and data extracted and collected in excel format. Data extracted included year of publication, author, time to MRI in pathway, inclusion or exclusion of post void residual measurement and specific cauda equina red flags used. An evidentiary review was also carried out on key topics including digital rectal examination.

resultsFollowing removal of duplicates a total of 307 articles underwent title and abstract screening from which 9 were eventually included for data extraction. All included papers recommended urgent MRI with the presence of red flag findings. Red flags included in all papers were perianal/perineal/saddle sensory disturbance and bladder or bowel dysfunction of varying specifications. 8/9 papers included radicular/sciatic pain, 5/9 included new motor weakness, 4/9 included DRE findings and PVR was included in 5/9 papers. PVR and DR examinations retain clinical significance.

conclusionWhile specific guidelines show minor variability, overall the current literature presents a consensus that in cases of suspected cauda equina syndrome MRI should be carried out on an urgent basis.

Indexed as

Cauda Equina SyndromePractice Guidelines as TopicHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingAssessmentCaudaCESEquinaGuidelinesSpineSyndrome

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.