ArticlePediatric blood & cancer2025
Rehabilitation's Vital Role in Pediatric Cancer Care: A Mixed Methods Study.
Article in Pediatric blood & cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Barriers and Facilitators to Participating in Pediatric Oncology Rehabilitation: Childhood Cancer Survivor and Caregiver Perspectives.Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Parent Perspectives on Physical Therapy for Their Child with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia:Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Article
- Bridging the gap in pediatric cancer rehabilitation care: a multi-perspective survey study.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRehabilitation (i.e., physical, occupational, speech therapy) aims to optimize function and quality of life (QOL) but is not consistently integrated into oncology care. This study aimed to develop a rehabilitation information sheet informed by the rehabilitation experiences of children diagnosed with cancer before age 19 and their parents/caregivers. PROCEDURE: This mixed methods, primarily qualitative study was conducted at two US children's hospitals. Eligible participants included childhood cancer survivors (CCS) aged 12-25 years who were referred to one or more rehabilitation therapies following diagnosis. Parents/Caregivers were eligible if their child was diagnosed with cancer before age 19 and referred to rehabilitation. Participants completed a semi-structured interview in English. Qualitative findings guided the development of a rehabilitation information sheet. CCS and caregiver participants and oncology and rehabilitation clinicians at the study sites provided feedback on the information sheet through an electronic survey.
resultsThirteen CCS, 33 parents/caregivers, and 36 clinicians participated. Participants described how engaging in rehabilitation promoted normalcy following a new pediatric cancer diagnosis and supported self-confidence and mental health. Participants wanted information about rehabilitation soon after the child's diagnosis and emphasized that they prioritized rehabilitation during cancer care. Common barriers to rehabilitation included treatment side effects, insurance, and outpatient scheduling, whereas clear communication and working with consistent providers supported engagement. Almost all individuals (99%) reported the information sheet was easy to understand and the amount of information was just right (86%).
conclusionsRehabilitation is highly valued by CCS and parents/caregivers, necessitating its integration into pediatric cancer care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.