Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40000380›Full record

ArticlePerspectives on sexual and reproductive health2025

"Distinct and Separate Issues": Examining US Adults' Attitudes Toward Abortion During COVID-19.

María Montenegro, Julie Maier, Danny Valdez, Frederica Jackson, Wen-Juo Lo, Ronna Turner, Brandon Crawford, Kristen Jozkowski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

María MontenegroDepartment of Spanish and Portuguese, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA.
Julie MaierIndependent Scholar, Bloomington, Indiana, USA.
Danny ValdezSchool of Public Health, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA.
Frederica JacksonSchool of Public Health, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA.
Wen-Juo LoCollege of Education & Health Professions, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas, USA.
Ronna TurnerCollege of Education & Health Professions, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas, USA.
Brandon CrawfordSchool of Public Health, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA.
Kristen JozkowskiSchool of Public Health, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic reshaped people's healthcare experiences and access to healthcare, including abortion. In response to the COVID-19 outbreak, some policymakers claimed that abortion is a nonessential service and should be restricted. In contrast, other policymakers contended that abortion is time-sensitive essential healthcare, and access to it should be protected. These efforts put access to abortion into the public arena during the onset of the pandemic. We examined whether people perceived the pandemic changed their attitudes toward abortion and their rationale for whether their support for abortion increased, decreased, or remained the same.

methodWe administered a web-based survey to US-based English and Spanish-speaking adults (n = 1583) to assess their abortion beliefs. Participants answered open and close-ended questions about abortion, including whether they believe the COVID-19 outbreak changed their views about abortion and why. Because our sample was not representative of the US population, we weighted the data and present weighted results.

resultsAs expected, most participants (91.7%) indicated that the COVID-19 outbreak did not change their abortion views. Many of these participants did not see a relationship between the COVID-19 pandemic and abortion. Participants who became more supportive (5.2%) cited well-being and financial concerns as reasons. Participants who became less supportive (3.1%) cited excessive death associated with the COVID-19 outbreak as their reason.

conclusionMost participants perceived that the COVID-19 pandemic did not change their views about abortion, suggesting the pandemic may not be a context linked to abortion attitudes.

Indexed as

Abortion, InducedCOVID-19Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdolescentAdultFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMaleMiddle AgedPandemicsPregnancySARS-CoV-2Surveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesYoung Adultabortionpublic healthpublic opinion

Identifiers

PMID40000380
PMCPMC11936860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.