ArticleThe journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease2025
Feasibility and acceptability of remote APOE-genotyping among research volunteers of an online recruitment registry (The Dutch Brain Research Registry).
Article in The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundParticipant recruitment for preclinical Alzheimer's disease (AD) prevention studies is challenging. Online registries facilitate large scale prescreening of individuals at risk for AD to accelerate recruitment. APOE-prescreening has the potential to better identify at-risk individuals. This study investigated the feasibility and acceptability of at-home APOE-genotyping in cognitively-normal registrants of an online registry.
methodsWe invited 9,287 cognitively-normal registrants of Dutch Brain Research Registry (DBRR) aged 50 to 75 for at-home APOE-genotype testing, without receiving the results. Feasibility was measured by participation ratio (participation/interested), swab-return ratio (returned-swabs/participation), and genotyping-success ratio (analyzed swabs/returned swabs). Acceptability was measured with online questions about information provision and project scope. We explored prescreening questions potentially reducing screen-failures.
resultsFeasibility was high with an 0.89 participation ratio (2,886/3,251), 0.90 swab-return ratio (2,886/2,597), 0.99 genotyping-success ratio (2,558/2,597). Acceptability was high, as participants were content with the information provision (87 %-97 %, n= 1,709-1,894), which was also well understood (91 %-93 %, n = 1,772-1,802). Among successful-analyzed swabs (n = 2,558), 27 % participants were APOE-ε4 heterozygote (n = 703), and 2 % homozygote (n = 60). Prescreening on a positive family history leads to a third reduction in the number of invitations needed to identify one APOE-ε4 carrier.
conclusionOur results suggest that APOE-ɛ4 genotyping in participants of an online research registry is feasible, well received and could be used to prescreen individuals at risk for AD for prevention studies. Adding a positive family history before invitation for APOE-genotyping, would further improve the prescreening process and reduce screen failures when identifying carriers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.